It is, however, primarily a linear process beginning with requirements and terminating in a final release or completion of the project. Moreover, all of the requirements for each step is completed before the next begins.Īlthough there are dates and schedules in a waterfall environment, each stage and project lasts until completion unless the rolling out initiative was specifically designed to be in phases comprised of multiple projects that build on one another.Ī healthy waterfall environment doesn’t employ a “throw it over the wall” mindset where stakeholders pass on responsibility to the owner of the next phase. Throughout the life of the project, there are well-defined stages with formalized hand-offs from one to the next. Waterfall is the “old school” way of managing projects. Let’s begin by covering the basics of each philosophy. That’s not to say that Agile and waterfall can’t coexist in the same organization, but for a particular project, it’s usually a “one-or-the-other” inflection point. Once you choose one path, it’s quite challenging to change course for that project, so it’s not a decision to take lightly. Understanding what these two approaches are and how they differ is important for anyone involved in product development, organizational change, program management, or almost any other kind of structured project.Īgile and waterfall often represent an irreversible fork in the road for any initiative. There’s no shortage of processes, frameworks, and philosophies when it comes to project management, but they ultimately fall into one of two camps: Agile vs.
0 kommentar(er)
